In Chapter 3, Chan talks about what Jesus said/believed about hell. In the preceding chapter, he takes a look at the commonly held beliefs of first century Jews concerning the afterlife. His conclusion
In the last chapter, we took a tour of Jesus’ world and saw that, without a doubt, first-century Jews believed in hell. They believed that hell was a place of punishment for the wicked after they faced God’s judgment. They used various images to describe this hell, such as fire, darkness, and lamentation. Some Jews believed that the wicked would be annihilated after being cast into hell, while others described hell as a place of never-ending torment.
He only mentions the Sadducees in the footnotes. They did not believe in any afterlife....and thus, they did not believe in hell. Some info about the Sadducees.....
"The Sadducees were a small party of very wealthy and influential aristocrats. Most Sadducees were priests, and the high priestly families (those families from whom the high priests traditionally came) controlled the sect and its membership.(Robinson, The Gospels, pp. 24
The only two solidly established traits of the Sadducees are that they were members of the ruling class, and that they did not believe in resurrection" (Murphy, The Religious World of Jesus, pp. 239).
So it is is a bit misleading to simply say that “without a doubt, first-century Jews believed in hell." Let’s just edit that statement a bit....
"without a doubt SOME/MOST first century Jews believed in hell....
But it was definitely not unanimous....yes?
And then he goes on to say that.....
Jesus grew up in the world of beliefs described in the last chapter. He would be expected to believe the same stuff about hell that most Jews did. And if He didn’t—if Jesus rejected the widespread Jewish belief in hell—then He would certainly need to be clear about this.
Says who? Frances Chan? Because the Bible...and Jesus....are crystal clear on everything? There is no ambiguity? There is only one way to interpret, understand, comprehend the words and actions of Jesus? Uh-huh. That's why there are so many different interpretations....leading to so many different denominations and creeds and "this is what we believe" statements. Because the Bible....and Jesus.....are totally clear on everything. Yep.....God said it, I believe it, that settles it. Perhaps we all read the same written words in scripture but we all interpret what God mean through our own particular filter.
Then he says....
That last line is very important. Better read it again.
Okay then...let's read it again:
if Jesus rejected the widespread Jewish belief in hell—then He would certainly need to be clear about this.
Okay....we read it again....go on.....
In other words, if Jesus did not agree with the view of hell presented in the last chapter, then He would have had to deliberately and clearly argue against it.
Really? Says who? Frances Chan? But wait a minute. Jesus = God, right? And God can do whatever he wants.....right? Earlier in the book (in a section that I will talk about later) Chan declares.....
God has the right to do WHATEVER He pleases
And so....since we aren't "the boss of Jesus" he didn't HAVE to do anything.
I don't think Jesus believed in hell...at least not as in ETC...Eternal Conscious Torment. And I certainly don't believe he preached it.
Many preachers/teacher smarter than me believe that his warnings of destruction were to the folks living and breathing during that generation, the first century Jews. (as in "...this generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled") Maybe Jesus was warning THAT generation about the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD if they (THAT generation) did not straighten up, fly right and heed his warnings..
So the Pharisees and the Essences....Jewish sects in the time of Jesus....believed in a hell like place of unending torment. Did Jesus endorse those beliefs? I don't think so....and I think Jesus articulated his beliefs in a way that was very clear to his contemporaries. More on that tomorrow/soon......
No comments:
Post a Comment